http://www.ernweb.com

No "crowding out" of science learning in sanctioned schools

Students improved performance in science as well as in math and reading at

Florida schools that received an F grade sanction the year before, finds a

research from the Center for Civic Innovation at the Manhattan Institute. The

researchers statistical analysis found no "crowding out" of learning in science

as the schools focused on reading and math achievement, a report says.

"These findings suggest that the incentives of Florida's high-stakes testing

program have not led to significant crowding out of student knowledge in the

low-stakes subject of science," says the report, "Building on the Basics:The

Impact of High-Stakes Testing on Student Proficiency in Low-Stakes Subjects."

"There is some evidence to suggest that student science proficiency increased

primarily because student learning in math and reading enabled that increase.

That is, learning in math and reading appear to contribute to learning in

science," the researchers write.

Schools often achieve gains in reading and math the year after receiving an F

grade sanction, the report says. In this study, researchers wanted to see how

students performed in science. With accountability focused intensely on reading

and math, one of educators' concerns has been that the time and effort spent on

reading and math is "crowding out" learning in other subjects.

Previous research in Chicago found that the high-stakes testing system led to

"significant learning gains in the low-stakes subjects of science and social

studies", the authors say. Their study of Florida schools drew a similar

conclusion in science only. In fact, students in Florida made slightly greater

gains in science than they did in math.

After one year, the F-grade sanction resulted in a gain in student science

proficiency of about a 0.08 standard deviation, . similar to the gain in reading

and somewhat greater than the gains in math.

Another possible reason for the gain in science may be that accountability

testing in reading and math could lead schools to adopt reforms that improve

their overall quality. For example, a school could more effectively motivate its

students, or it could improve relations with its teachers.

Beginning in the 2002--03 school year, Florida public schools were required

to test for proficiency in science when they administered the state's math and

reading exams. The science part of the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test

(FCAT), is currently administered to all public school students in grades 5, 8,

and 11. The results of the science exam have now been incorporated directly into

the accountability program; but during the years of analysis, they did not count

in the schools' ratings.

Building on the Basics:The Impact of High-Stakes Testing on Student

Proficiency in Low-Stakes Subjects by Marcus A. Winters, et al, Center for Civic

Innovation at the Manhattan Institute, Civic Report, , Number 54, July 2008.

Other research briefs
href="http://www.ernweb.com/public/1105.cfm">Talent management comes to public

education
High school

teachers stress self-determination
href="http://www.ernweb.com/public/1103.cfm">Teaching cognitive strategieshref="http://www.ernweb.com/public/1104.cfm">
href="http://www.ernweb.com/public/1108.cfm">Middle schoolers misunderstand

equal sign in math
School

data reveals the effects of tracking on students