Educational research that highlights education training, no child left behind policy, and webinars.
Home | Current issue | Recent Issues | Browse by Topic | Join It's FREE! | Upcoming webinars | Webinars on CD-ROM | Member Login


 TOPICS
Reading
Math
Behavior
Assessment
At-risk students
ELLs
 DEPARTMENTS
Current issue
Recent Issues
Research briefs
Join It's FREE!
Upcoming webinars
Webinars on CD-ROM
 RESOURCES
Contact Us
Help
Manage My Membership
Our Guarantee
Tell a Friend
Text Size
 ABOUT US
Statement of Purpose
About this Site
Journals/Periodicals


INSIDE THE
CURRENT ISSUE

National survey of literacy teachers examinees obstacles to bringing more technology into classrooms

How Framework for Teaching changes dialogue between principals and teachers during evaluations

Aggressive classroom management counterproductive, study says
-
School program helps 5th and 6th graders develop positive body image and increase self-esteem
-
Blog: Healthy Frustration

Become a member It's FREE. Get access to every article on the site.


Do tracked schools have same effect as tracking within a school?

Tracking within schools has been shown in many studies to have negative effects on students, but what about the effects of tracked schools (academic and vocational schools)?

A new study of Flemish students published in the American Educational Research Journal finds that vocational students who attend schools with multiple tracks have slightly lower study involvement than vocational students who attend vocational schools. There was no difference in study involvement for academic students attending both types of schools.

"The data suggest that in multilateral schools, vocational students compared themselves with academic track students, consistent with the hypothesis of increased status deprivation, resulting in even stronger antischool attitudes," the authors write.

In Flanders, as in other European countries, a rigid form of tracking is applied, explain the authors. The researchers analyzed data on 5,910 secondary school students in Flanders who were in the equivalent of U.S. grades 9 and 11. The students attended 66 secondary schools in Flanders. Study involvement was measured with a 6-item scale assessing general feelings of study engagement, such as "I don't like to study," "studying is a waste of time," etc.

"Since the late 1960s, research has demonstrated repeatedly that students in lower tracks develop an antischool culture to overcome the status deprivation resulting from being in a lower track," the authors write.

They do not want to imply by the study that within-school tracking should be abandoned and replaced by between-school tracking. Flemish research has shown that tracking not only causes academic divergence between groups of students, but it also leads to the development of distinct cultural and political attitudes and values.

"Unless it is desirable for society to develop into a dual society on the basis of educational attainment, between-school tracking should not be encouraged," the authors write.

"Study Involvement of Academic and Vocational Students: Does Between-School Tracking Sharpen the Difference?" by Mieke Van Houtte and Peter Stevens. American Educational Research Journal, December 2009, Volume 46, Issue 4, pps. 943-974.

Other research briefs
Do tracked schools have same effect as tracking within a school?
Students overestimate memory, underestimate studying
Collaboration models for general ed and special ed teachers
Stereotype consciousness related to underperformance for some groups

Blog: Is your school the "Gypsy school"?


Upcoming Webinars

Feb. 1
Put RTI to work in your math classroom with Paul Riccomini

Feb. 15
Tune up your classroom management skills with Rick Smith's proven tips and strategies

NOW ON CD-ROM!
How to use the iPad to become more effective with Justin Baeder

Sign me up for FREE research news