education research
Home | Browse by Topic | Subscribe | Webinars | Member Login


Subscribe Now!
Don't miss out on important research!
Reading
Math
Behavior
Assessment
At-risk students
ELLs
Current issue
Recent Issues
Research briefs
Subscribe
Webinars
Contact Us
Help
Manage My Account
Our Guarantee
Renew My Subscription
Tell a Friend
Text Size
Statement of Purpose
About this Site
Journals/Periodicals
test
trial


INSIDE THE
CURRENT ISSUE

Daily check-in/out with behavior coach helps students walk the line

Use 3 broad categories for educational outcomes in IEPs, study says
-
Sentence combining is underused strategy for improving student writing

Vocabulary instruction teaches middle-schoolers academic words with friendly text
-
2-stage process can improve efficiency of screening readers in 1st grade
-
Download the CURRENT ISSUE >>

Subscription information


Little impact seen from student mentor programs

Student-mentoring programs had no significant impact on students' academic achievement and engagement, interpersonal relationships and high-risk or delinquent behaviors, according to a Department of Education impact study. However, the study of 32 student-mentoring program and 2,573 students in grades 4-8 did find different impacts for girls and boys.

Mentoring programs showed some benefits for girls and mixed results for boys in subgroup analyses. Girls with mentors self-reported higher scholastic efficacy and better school bonding and pro-social behaviors, the study says. While boys with mentors had more of a future orientation (as did girls), they had lower scores on pro-social behavior scales than controls. Younger students with mentors (below the age of 12) had a decrease in truancy compared to their control group peers.

The researchers measured a total of 17 outcomes in the domains of interpersonal relationships and personal responsibility, academic achievement and engagement, and high-risk or delinquent behavior to evaluate the impact of student mentor programs.

Mentors, on average, reported meeting with their students, on a weekly basis for approximately one hour per meeting. For students who were matched with mentors, the average length of the relationship was 5.8 months. Controls were students who were wait-listed for mentors. Because 35% of the control group students reported receiving mentoring either from the school-based program or elsewhere in the community and because some treatment group students did not meet with a mentor, the treatment contrast was reduced, the researchers note.

"Impact Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Education's Student Mentoring Program," Lawrence Bernstein et al, Institute of Education Sciences, March 2009.

Other research briefs:
ESL placement and student achievement
Using errors in math instruction
Syllable instruction for middle schoolers
Including obesity prevention in after-school programs
If connected, students take action when there's a threat
Blog: Pros and cons and second thoughts on merit pay for teachers




Printer-Friendly Format




How to Teach Students Rules and Expectations for Behavior

DON KINCAID
Sept. 16, 2010

SEE DETAILS

Keep me updated

WEBINARS
ON DEMAND

Self Management: How to Teach Kids to Control Their Own Behavior
LISTEN NOW! >>

25 Strategies to Reduce Challenging Behavior LISTEN NOW! >>

How one California High School Went from a Dropout Culture to College-going Culture
LISTEN NOW! >>

Create a Successful Literacy Coaching Program for Teachers in Grades 4-12
LISTEN NOW! >>

Before It's Too Late: Reach Out to Parents with an Effective Parent Liaison Program
LISTEN NOW! >>