Educational research that highlights education training, no child left behind policy, and webinars.
Home | Current issue | Recent Issues | Browse by Topic | Join It's FREE! | Upcoming webinars | Webinars on CD-ROM | Member Login


 TOPICS
Reading
Math
Behavior
Assessment
At-risk students
ELLs
 DEPARTMENTS
Current issue
Recent Issues
Research briefs
Join It's FREE!
Upcoming webinars
Webinars on CD-ROM
 RESOURCES
Contact Us
Help
Manage My Membership
Our Guarantee
Tell a Friend
Text Size
 ABOUT US
Statement of Purpose
About this Site
Journals/Periodicals


INSIDE THE
CURRENT ISSUE

National survey of literacy teachers examinees obstacles to bringing more technology into classrooms

How Framework for Teaching changes dialogue between principals and teachers during evaluations

Aggressive classroom management counterproductive, study says
-
School program helps 5th and 6th graders develop positive body image and increase self-esteem
-
Blog: Healthy Frustration

Become a member It's FREE. Get access to every article on the site.


Little impact seen from student mentor programs

Student-mentoring programs had no significant impact on students' academic achievement and engagement, interpersonal relationships and high-risk or delinquent behaviors, according to a Department of Education impact study. However, the study of 32 student-mentoring program and 2,573 students in grades 4-8 did find different impacts for girls and boys.

Mentoring programs showed some benefits for girls and mixed results for boys in subgroup analyses. Girls with mentors self-reported higher scholastic efficacy and better school bonding and pro-social behaviors, the study says. While boys with mentors had more of a future orientation (as did girls), they had lower scores on pro-social behavior scales than controls. Younger students with mentors (below the age of 12) had a decrease in truancy compared to their control group peers.

The researchers measured a total of 17 outcomes in the domains of interpersonal relationships and personal responsibility, academic achievement and engagement, and high-risk or delinquent behavior to evaluate the impact of student mentor programs.

Mentors, on average, reported meeting with their students, on a weekly basis for approximately one hour per meeting. For students who were matched with mentors, the average length of the relationship was 5.8 months. Controls were students who were wait-listed for mentors. Because 35% of the control group students reported receiving mentoring either from the school-based program or elsewhere in the community and because some treatment group students did not meet with a mentor, the treatment contrast was reduced, the researchers note.

"Impact Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Education's Student Mentoring Program," Lawrence Bernstein et al, Institute of Education Sciences, March 2009.

Other research briefs:
ESL placement and student achievement
Using errors in math instruction
Syllable instruction for middle schoolers
Including obesity prevention in after-school programs
If connected, students take action when there's a threat
Blog: Pros and cons and second thoughts on merit pay for teachers




Printer-Friendly Format

Upcoming Webinars

Feb. 1
Put RTI to work in your math classroom with Paul Riccomini

Feb. 15
Tune up your classroom management skills with Rick Smith's proven tips and strategies

NOW ON CD-ROM!
How to use the iPad to become more effective with Justin Baeder

Sign me up for FREE research news