Educational research that highlights education training, no child left behind policy, and webinars.
Home | Current issue | Recent Issues | Browse by Topic | Join It's FREE! | Upcoming webinars | Webinars on CD-ROM | Member Login


 TOPICS
Reading
Math
Behavior
Assessment
At-risk students
ELLs
 DEPARTMENTS
Current issue
Recent Issues
Research briefs
Join It's FREE!
Upcoming webinars
Webinars on CD-ROM
 RESOURCES
Contact Us
Help
Manage My Membership
Our Guarantee
Tell a Friend
Text Size
 ABOUT US
Statement of Purpose
About this Site
Journals/Periodicals


INSIDE THE
CURRENT ISSUE

National survey of literacy teachers examinees obstacles to bringing more technology into classrooms

How Framework for Teaching changes dialogue between principals and teachers during evaluations

Aggressive classroom management counterproductive, study says
-
School program helps 5th and 6th graders develop positive body image and increase self-esteem
-
Blog: Healthy Frustration

Become a member It's FREE. Get access to every article on the site.


3 instruments to evaluate teacher quality in math stand out

Of 9 instruments used to evaluate teaching quality in math, 3 instruments were found to have the most desirable characteristics, according to a study in Early Childhood Education Journal. Those 3 instruments are: COEMET (pre-K), the RTOP (K-University) and the Inside the Classroom Observation Pro (K-12), the researchers report.

While the researchers' focus was on measuring teaching quality at the preschool level, instruments for all grade levels were evaluated. Only COEMET is for the preschool age group, the other 2 instruments are for K-12. However, based on their study, the researchers note that RTOP seems to be more suited for older grades (grades 6 to university level) whereas the Inside the Classroom Observation Protocol seems to be better suited to the younger grades (grades K-5).

"The broad range of applicability for many of these measures is possible because they do not focus on information that is specific to an age range, instead addressing constructs that apply to education of students of all ages," the researchers report.

All 3 instruments have goals that are specifically aligned with the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards and examine lesson, teaching and classroom characteristics important in a measure of quality. They were the only instruments to measure teacher-student interactions.

"Research suggests that teacher-child interactions are a primary mediator of educational practice, significantly influencing child outcomes," the researchers write. "Therefore the quality of those interactions is of significant concern."

"An Analysis of Instruments that Measure the Quality of Mathematics Teaching in Early Childhood," by Carolyn Kilday and Mable Kinzie, Early Childhood Education Journal, 2009, Volume 36, pps. 365-372.

Other research briefs:
Mass. elementary teachers must pass math test
Costly Miami whole school reform program deemed a failure
High school students develop summer reading lists online
Achievement emotions play important role
Struggling teen readers need word-level help in reading

Printer-Friendly Format

Upcoming Webinars

Feb. 1
Put RTI to work in your math classroom with Paul Riccomini

Feb. 15
Tune up your classroom management skills with Rick Smith's proven tips and strategies

NOW ON CD-ROM!
How to use the iPad to become more effective with Justin Baeder

Sign me up for FREE research news