http://www.ernweb.com

Read-aloud testing improves math scores for high school students

Even students without learning disabilities (LDs) may improve their scores on

mathematic tests if they are tested with read-aloud accommodation, according to

a recent study published in The Journal of Special Education.

In an

unexpected finding, secondary school students without disabilities showed twice

the gain of students with disabilities when they took mathematics tests with a

read-aloud accommodation, according to a study of 625 middle and high school

students (388 with LDs).

Read-aloud testing accommodations often make it

possible for students with learning disabilities (LDs) to demonstrate their

genuine abilities in statewide assessments. Researcher Batya Elbaum of the

University of Miami speculates that one reason for the boost in performance for

general students is that many may have been poor readers who had greater

proficiency in math than students with LDs.

Reframing the debate
"The findings of this study

underscore the need to reframe the issue of testing accommodations as one that

is relevant to all students, and not only to students with disabilities," writes

Elbaum. In designing assessment systems, educators should incorporate testing

accommodations such as oral presentation of items on a mathematics test for

general education students as well as students with LDs, the article

states.

Do the results of the study mean the oral accommodation is not

fair or invalid? Elbaum asks. One view on accommodations is that to be valid

they should improve the performance of students with disabilities while having

no effect on students without disabilities.

For example, allowing

students with motor difficulties to dictate their answers to a scribe addresses

the students' disability but would not be expected to improve the performance of

students without motor impairments.

href="https://www.ernweb.com/public/5.cfm">Click

here to subscribe to Educational Research

Newsletter 

In this study,

student were tested with  two 30-item mathematics tests with items drawn

from practice materials from statewide tests. The two tests were administered in

one class period--one in read-aloud and one in standard condition.



Rather than proving that oral accommodation is not valid or fair, the

researcher proposes that the results of the study bolster an argument by S.

Sireci (2005) that testing accommodations may simply allow more precise

measurement of students' abilities.

More precise

measurement
"If the primary objective of implementing testing

accommodations is not that of 'closing the gap', but rather that of achieving a

more precise measurement of students' abilities in an area such as mathematics,

then it would follow that the oral accommodation ought to be regularly offered

to all students," Elbaum writes.

Besides showing that general education students can benefit from read-aloud

accommodation in mathematics testing, the study also showed that not all

students with LDs benefit from this accommodation. Approximately 8% of students

with disabilities performed significantly less well with a read-aloud

accommodation for reasons that are not clear, the researcher says.

A

previous study found that general education students "became impatient with the

time needed to finish reading the items aloud and reported that they disliked

the pacing of the test in the accommodated condition." In this study, students

in the read-aloud condition were encouraged to follow along with the test

administrator, who read each item aloud twice.

Not appropriate for all LD students
Students with LDs

should only be assigned to an accommodated testing condition based on prior

evidence indicating the student is likely to benefit from it, the researcher

notes.

Though blanket assignment of students to an oral accommodation

might improve group performance, the author notes, for a small minority of

students the testing accommodation would introduce another variance in

results.

One of the purposes of the study was to show the effect of

accommodations with an older set of students--many such studies have been done

with elementary students. When the results of this study were combined with

those of 13 previously published studies, Elbaum says the impact of oral

accommodations on students' mathematics performance was not the same for

elementary and secondary students.

Among elementary students, "the

accommodation boost for elementary students is clearly of greater magnitude for

students with LD than it is for students without LD."

Among secondary

students, the read-aloud accommodation may have helped improve performance

because of fewer errors owing to failure to encode or to make careful

distinctions among response choices.

"Effects of an Oral Testing

Accommodation on the Mathematics Performance of Secondary Students With and

Without Learning Disabilities", by Batya Elbaum, The Journal of Special

Education, Volume 40, Number 4, 2007, pp. 218-229.



Published in ERN February 2007 Volume 20 Number 2