Dept. of Defense schools a model
for helping mobile students
Schools have wrestled for a long time with the academic problems presented by
students who move from district to district. Student mobility is associated with
lower achievement, writes Dale Titus in a recent issue of the National
Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, possibly because of
curricular inconsistency across schools, but also because many transient students are
from lower-income families.
Department of Defense schools provide a good model for how to work
successfully with this population, Titus says. While some aspects of the DoDEA's
program cannot be implemented by public schools, administrators can learn some
valuable lessons from the approach taken by DoDEA, he says.
The Department of Defense Education Activity operates more than 200 public
schools around the world for the children of military personnel and other
government personnel, overseeing approximately 8,785 teachers serving 102,600
students.
"Military families spend on average three years at one military post before
they are reassigned," Titus writes. "As a result the student population turnover
rate is about 37% each year for children in military families. Despite student
mobility, DoDEA students scored above average on both the math and verbal
sections of the SAT I, with a 67% student participation rate.
Standardized curriculum and transition system The high
student mobility rate prompted DoDEA administrators to institute a standardized
transition system to help transferring students and a system of uniform
curriculum with standards-based instruction.
"Since DoDEA schools around the world share a common curriculum,
students who transfer within the DoDEA system do not have to adjust to a new
course load," the author writes.
"Continuity of instruction for all students is a basic tenet of the movement
for high academic standards," the article states. "Unfortunately for mobile
students, state standards and their alignment to local curricula and instruction
assume a relatively static student population."
While it is difficult for schools to duplicate the Department of Defense
model because of differences in curriculum across states and districts (DoDEA
also spends $2,000 more on each student than the average and pays teachers
$10,000 more), there are other features and policies schools can incorporate.
For example, when new students arrive, DoDEA schools: • Assess
students in reading and mathematics with a computer-based diagnostic program
within 48 hours of arrival; • conduct a standardized interview to
assess student academic standing if the students do not have their student
records; and they • provide an orientation with a guidance counselor for
incoming students and assign a buddy to the new student.
To better understand the challenges high school students face when moving
from one school to another, the Military Child Education Coalition conducted the
Secondary Education Transition Study (SETS) for the U.S. Army.
Among the suggested best practices for local schools are: • Timely
transfer of student records; • checklist for student
transfers; • immediate new student orientation including a transition
buddy; • access to extracurricular programs; • communication of
variations in school calendars and schedules; • staff professional
development on issues related to mobile students; and • reciprocal
graduation requirements for course substitutions, waivers, and testing.
Students should be advised of the courses and credits they will need for
graduation and encouraged to take as many credits as possible to ensure
graduation. Parents and students should also be informed about the problems
often encountered when changing schools and how to minimize those difficulties,
Titus says.
Toolkits on moving to different schools for parents, educators and special
needs students are available at the website for military students www.militarystudent.dod.mil. A
checklist for student transfers includes procedures for both sending and
receiving schools to minimize the disruption caused by the transfer. A 95-page
toolkit for educational leaders includes checklists and recommended resources on
student mobility.
Florida and Texas have developed electronic portfolios for migrant students,
the author writes, and the federal government plans to develop a national system
for electronic transfer of student records that would be beneficial for mobile
students. School districts should be flexible with district attendance area
boundaries and provide transportation to help students remain in their schools.
Academic performance of mobile students should be closely monitored.
"Despite the challenges created by student transience, many schools have not
yet implemented procedures to minimize the adverse effects of student mobility,"
Titus writes.
"Strategies and Resources for Enhancing the Achievement of Mobile
Students" by Dale Titus, National Association of Secondary School
Principals March 2007 Volume 91 Number 1 pp. 81-97.
Published in ERN May/June 2007 Volume 20 Number 5
|